“It is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required”

These are the words of Dr Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, PhD), Director, Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC, in a letter to Dr June Raine, Chief Executive of the MHRA, the same MHRA which has recently authorised the use of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ in children aged 12-15. It is almost inconceivable that they would do this, given the number and seriousness of the adverse reactions to the ‘vaccines’ being recorded on their own ‘early warning’ database, especially when children of that age are at statistically zero risk of serious Covid disease. But we live in strange times, so strange in fact, so deeply disturbing that our government is threatening not to end lockdown restrictions completely on June 21st because they haven’t coerced enough younger people to get injected with the blood toxin they are calling a ‘vaccine’.

Here are a few relevant passages from that letter:

The Covid-19 vaccines were rolled out in the UK on the 8th of December 2020. As of the 6th May 2021 nearly 39 million people have received their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine, and 24 million both doses. Sufficient data have now accumulated to get a good overview of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). I would, therefore, like to draw your attention to the high number of covid-19 vaccine-attributed deaths and ADRs that have been reported via the Yellow Card system between the 4th January 2021 and the 26th May 2021. In total, 1,253 deaths and 888,196 ADRs (256,224 individual reports) were reported during this period.

To facilitate a better clinical understanding of the nature of the adverse events occurring, primarily to inform doctors at the frontline, we have searched the Yellow Card reports using pathology-specific key words to group the data according to the following five broad, clinically relevant categories:

A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs

B. Immune System ADRs

C. ‘Pain’ ADRs

D. Neurological ADRs

E. ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell

F. Pregnancy ADRs

A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic Adverse Drug Reactions

We used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify bleeding, clotting and ischaemic ADRs: bleed, haemo*, thrombo*, emboli*, coag*, death, ischaem*, infarct*, angina, stroke, cerebrovascular, CVA.

We included the term ‘death’ in this search group, as this term accounted for many reported fatalities (438) without specific details. Given the large number of fatalities without a specific cause of death, we considered that ADRs reported in this way, in particular as ‘sudden death’, would be most likely to occur from haemorrhagic, thrombo-embolic or ischaemic events. Given the seriousness of this ADR, we considered it justifiable to do this pending a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to clarify the cause of death in these 438 people.

Using these search terms, 13,766 bleeding, clotting and ischaemic ADRs were identified – 856 of which were fatal. Government reports have highlighted the occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, apparently accounting for 24 fatalities and 226 ADRs up to the 26th May 2021.However, our analysis indicates that thromboembolic ADRs have been reported in almost every vein and artery, including large vessels like the aorta, and in every organ including other parts of the brain, lungs, heart, spleen, kidneys, ovaries and liver, with life-threatening and life-changing consequences. The most common Yellow Card categories affected by these sorts of ADRs were the nervous system (152 fatalities, mainly from brain bleeds and clots), respiratory (with 103 fatalities, mainly from pulmonary thromboembolism) and cardiac categories (81 fatalities).

So, you see, it’s not just “extremely rare” cerebral venous sinus thromboses which are the problem here. Blood clots are forming in blood vessels throughout the body and in virtually every organ. This suggests that the vaccine and/or its spike protein product is getting into the vascular system and being distributed widely. This was not supposed to happen! To get an idea of just how massive a problem this may be, Dr Reiner Fuellmich, the German lawyer currently pursuing Covid human rights violations class action lawsuits, cites a German clinical study which measured D-dimer levels in volunteers before and after ‘vaccination’. Regardless of any adverse reactions, D-dimer levels were elevated post vaccination in almost half of volunteers, proving that clot formation was taking place. If that sample is representative of the vaccinated population as a whole, then it is truly shocking. Remember, each time you are jabbed, these toxins circulate around the blood system and the psychopaths in charge are proposing 3rd and even 4th booster jabs this winter.

Thrombo-embolic events aren’t the only problem:

B. Immune System Adverse Drug Reactions (Infection, Inflammation,Autoimmune, Allergic)

We used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify immune system ADRs: INFECTION (category), IMMUNE DISORDERS (category), -itis; immun, multiple sclerosis, lupus, myasthenia, pernicious, diabetes, Addison, Crohn’s, Coeliac, Graves, alopecia, amyloidosis, antiphospholipid, angioedema, Behcet’s, pemphigoid, psoriasis, aplasia, sarcoidosis, scleroderma, thrombocytopenia, vitiligo, Miller Fisher, Guillain-Barre; allerg*, urticaria, rash, eczema, asthma.

To the 26th May, a total of 54,870 ADRs and 171 fatalities fell into this category, which comprised the second most common cause of post-vaccination fatalities after ‘Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs’. However, only 4 associated fatalities were reported under the Yellow card ‘IMMUNE DISORDERS’ category, with the majority (141 fatalities associated with 19,474 ADRs) reported under the ‘INFECTIONS’ category. Among 1,187 people for whom post-vaccination COVID infection was reported, there were 72 fatalities (6% of reported COVID infection ADRs).

Many ‘INFECTION’ category ADRs indicated the occurrence of re-activation of latent viruses, including Herpes Zoster or shingles (1,827 ADRs), Herpes Simplex (943 ADRs, 1 fatal), and Rabies (1 fatal ADR) infections. This is strongly suggestive of vaccine-induced immune-compromise.Bell’s palsy, also associated with latent virus reactivation, is reported in the Neurological ADRs section of this report (D). Also suggestive of vaccine-induced immunocompromise was the high number of immune-mediated conditions reported, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome (280 ADRs, 6 deaths), Crohn’s and non-infective colitis (231 ADRs, 2 deaths) and Multiple Sclerosis (113 ADRs).

Allergic responses to the vaccines comprised 25,270 reported ADRs, with 4 fatalities occurring among 1,001 people experiencing anaphylactic reactions. 

Additionally, we have the following classes of adverse reactions which also give cause for concern:

C. ‘Pain’ Adverse Drug Reactions

D. Neurological Adverse Drug Reactions

E. Adverse Drug Reactions involving loss of sight, hearing, speech or smell

F. Pregnancy Adverse Drug Reactions

As if all that wasn’t bad enough, we also have the unforeseen potential long term adverse reactions. We know for sure now that the drug companies have screwed up by not anticipating very serious immediate adverse reactions, so it’s more than plausible that they have failed to anticipate long term serious adverse reactions too.

According to the recent paper by Seneff and Nigh (1), potential acute and long-term pathologies include:

• Pathogenic priming, multisystem inflammatory disease and autoimmunity

• Allergic reactions and anaphylaxis

• Antibody dependent enhancement

• Activation of latent viral infections

• Neurodegeneration and prion diseases

• Emergence of novel variants of SARSCoV2

• Integration of the spike protein gene into the human DNA

The author calls for an immediate halt to the vaccine rollout:

The nature and variety of ADRs reported to the Yellow Card System are consistent with the potential pathologies described in this paper and supported by other recent scientific papers on vaccine-induced harms, which are mediated through the vaccine spike protein product (2,3). It is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease, immune suppression,autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

This is perhaps the most damning sentence in the entire letter:

The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.

Why? Well, aside from the obvious, it comes within a week of when, far from withdrawing the emergency use authorisation for these ‘vaccines’ generally, the MHRA has in fact extended their use to children who were not even included in the original trials, on the basis of a ridiculously underpowered recent clinical trial in the States. Seriously WTAF is going on?

UPDATE: Watch this video. Just watch it – before YouTube delete it. I cannot stress how important it is to view this video. It is your duty as a human being.

https://newtube.app/user/PhilStone/p01lQ7L?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=fbe3476ad2f7ce0a4bd0fce10834b9dea6a7046c-1623771117-0-AXO4hUMwVvnapjfo0ZClBWSlb09cDq0HjI2z0CYhPGXc_W5Ov7ZsAVQhfY6WRFCxM13NS5jYamTIistagoUHUr2VlI6jRUXYq9-tcUoks9znltBw1y68hWk71hNDkyHKc0MRVnPh6Hq-yLOUrtyv7-4PUvBWjsmHaIkjOQTFi6gQd09nTmTSECI9tYHL3VlkRfGDqScii0gdnl3SEkCLlWtgh3BYspbmlSi-bFSPW5AGi3wdOweOXGiWdhMG_YMais7wnNcJVKI1ibagsyPRBImBH8KG8e4I0AaGGH5BI0VAEZFl45cIaaIZpk69bqQbxIYb3L5M6rSls1IvdivQ1Kdl3Y844Rifw0IRTAKepDJT4mrwae6Rl3Cxg5kE87xU0oX81nEDaLvnXc4uoeFTvNWeRy-QFKOXnULg3u2mftjfNd6W1FEMnlBBcsrwfRqFdZlgFvCjHK860ns96_aBUg-V07sArS1xiVXfDwS_lWsU

Here is the entire video:

https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/how-to-save-the-world,-in-three-easy:0?r=FuWwFotRbicqY9GHyWBqDdTNNHpaTgC9

15 comments

  1. I didn’t make it to the video before its rendition to the YouTube video Guantanamo Bay. One thing I’m getting more sure of is that the news on these treatments is only going in one direction, and that it will be all bad news from here on in. Unfortunately, those who think it is a good thing are never going to change their minds though. It’s a religion, like climate change.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Dr. Byram Bridle points out that there is a large body of scientific literature now which demonstrates that as much as 75% of the mRNA ‘vaccine’ does not remain in the shoulder where it is injected, but travels widely throughout the body, actually facilitated by the polyethylene glycol lipid nanoparticles which encapsulate the mRNA. You have to ask yourself, why did Pfizer not identify this problem in the trials? It should have been evident if the trials were conducted properly and rigorously. (6 mins onwards). [Youtube links are not showing here for some reason. Just add ‘h’ to the address and paste into the browser address bar). I suspect that Youtube are trying to censor this video without actually removing it, because the link will not work anywhere you try to paste it.

    ttps://youtu.be/ByW3WrU_Xxs

    Or try here:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/JaneDryden4/status/1405806421493665799

    Like

  3. I’ve just watched all but the last few minutes of the 3hr16 of How to save the world, in three easy steps, the Bret Weinstein moderated discussion that YouTube has deleted, of which the last comment gave a useful excerpt. Weinstein I trust and that’s why I dipped my toe in here. They are all very positive about the quaity of work of Tess Lawrie in the UK. The implications are truly alarming. I think Bret and Dr Malone model well how to talk about so much bad practice without being too quick to assign motives. But ‘extended regulatory capture’ by Big Pharma fits the bill. Thanks for alerting me to this.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I came via the latest post Jaime, having ‘approved’ this link from it on Cliscep:

    Greta looks none too pleased, perhaps because that old post of yours began with her!

    Model runs aren’t data. This is utterly basic. I agree with all that. Matt Ridley’s latest in the Telegraph is on point and is now on his blog by the way (bypassing the paywall). But Matt didn’t get the vaccine situation right if Tess Lawrie and now Bret Weinstein have. And your instincts about the dangers of rushing such a rollout *were* right, a long way back.

    I was helped by Weinstein saying it’s highly complex for the layman at the beginning. I haven’t processed the implications, anything like. The dangers for women and their reproductive systems sound terrible, for just one thing. But because it’s so complex and novel I fear we’re just going to have to wait for all the bad news for those of us who took the jabs.

    The suppression of the data about ivermectin and the like, and Big Tech’s involvement in that, is the other side of the coin. Steve Mc was one of many who got this part right, using basic risk analysis, when I was still plugged in to Twitter. But the vaccine side, and the regulatory steps that had been skipped, and their impact, was too much for many of us. Suppression of adverse events here and the people who have suffered them is truly awful. Respect indeed to Steve Kirsch for listening to the ‘anecdata’ from people he knew personally and really following up on that. And thus providing the ‘red pill’ moment for Weinstein.

    Enough from me now. I will track things from here but may not say much more for a month, due to other factors.

    Like

  5. Richard, thanks for your comment, which actually does mean an awful lot to me. I think I’ve seen some snippets of that interview, which is made even more highly significant by the presence of Malone, the inventor of mRNA ‘vaccine’ technology who is now warning against the use of Pfizer and other jabs in younger people especially. If governments and regulators will not listen to him, then who will they listen to? Matt Ridley is convinced the vaccines ‘work’ and are responsible therefore for the observed decline in deaths. But at what cost I wonder, even if they are proven to save ‘Covid’ lives? Much the same decline happened last summer when there were no ‘vaccines’, so it could be seasonal effects combined with the almost certain ‘fact’ that the UK has exceeded by some margin the threshold for herd immunity (due to natural infections and jabs). ONS figures show that 80% now have antibodies. If that’s so, this exceeds even the herd immunity threshold even for an immunologically naive, homogeneous population – which the UK is not. There is no clinical or public health justification for keep jabbing people now with these demonstrably dangerous ‘vaccines’ using emergency legislation, especially not children. It’s way beyond crazy and in fact risks creating another public health emergency, which we may already be witnessing with A&E depts under intense pressure.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Interesting point that emerges from the Weinstein video. The lipids are ionisable, meaning they can be electrically charged. This might explain the abnormal concentrations in the ovaries shown by the Japanese lab rat biodistribution study. I wonder also if it is connected in any way with these persistent but unverified tales and numerous videos of people’s arms apparently becoming bizarrely magnetically attractive after ‘vaccination’?

    Like

    1. Here you go. Two studies. Scientists knew as far back as 2013 that lipid nanoparticles accumulated in high concentrations in the ovaries and adrenals.

      “Unexpectedly, lipidots showed specific uptake in steroid organs. Unexpectedly, lipidots showed specific uptake in steroid organs, which to our knowledge has never yet been reported for a lipid nanoparticle.

      No significant uptake was observed in the spleen, lung, kidney, or urine; high concentrations of the 3 tracers were recovered from the bile, albeit with a large interanimal variability. Altogether, uptake was major in gonadosteroid organs (i.e., liver, adrenals, ovaries), suggesting a specific tropism of lipidots for these organs.

      DiD fluorescence levels in the ovaries were high enough to be observed directly through the skin of live mice 24 h after the injection of DiD-loaded lipidots (Fig. 3A). After laparotomy, DiD fluorescence created a clear contrast with adjacent tissue in the adrenals and ovaries.”

      https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/54/11/1996

      So many lipidots accumulated in the mouse ovaries that the fluorescence could be observed through the skin!

      “Other vital organs of the human body that nanoparticles reach include the brain (Elder et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008), and the testis (Bai et al., 2010), or even the fetus, which are protected by their own specialized barriers. Nevertheless, even these vital organs are not fully protected, since certain nanoparticles can effectively penetrate their barriers (De Jong et al., 2008). The ability of nanoparticles to bypass/penetrate these defensive, protective barriers of the human body depends on their physical (e.g., size, shape, aspect ratio; Meng et al., 2007; Qiu et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2011) and chemical properties (e.g., aggregation, surface chemical, charge status). For example, positively charged nanoparticles can more effectively enter the cell since the cellular membrane (which consists of a double layer of phospholipids) is negatively charged. This has been also confirmed in independent experiments studying the cellular uptake of nanoparticles (e.g., polyethyleneimine-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles), which are positively charged, demonstrating an increased uptake by cells compared to negatively charged nanoparticles (Xia et al., 2009). Thus, the increased uptake of positively charged (cationic) nanoparticles may result in increased damage of membrane phospholipids as well as increased damage to cellular compartments (e.g., the lysosomes; Xia et al., 2006).”

      https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2017.00606/full

      Liked by 1 person

  7. The general rule is
    the “show me the bodies” rule
    eg where are these dead people with pollution on their death certificates ?

    So where are all these people
    with *vaccine* on their death certificate ?
    or “coincidental blood clot” etc

    Liked by 1 person

  8. You want the bodies Stew? You only have to look. It’s not difficult. Here in VAERS for instance (which is now out of date, so deaths will be even greater):

    4826 ‘Covid vaccine deaths’ reported in 2021 to June. 3192 deaths reported in total from ALL other vaccines 2000-2020. So in 6 months, the Covid ‘vaccines’ have killed more Americans than all other vaccines combined over a period of 20 years. This is comparing apples to apples unless you are arguing that there has been a conspiracy to file fake death reports from Covid vax or, for some unknown reason, Covid vax deaths are far more likely to be reported than other vaccine deaths. In fact, the opposite appears to be true, with members of the medical profession appearing to be very reluctant to file reports of Covid vax fatalities or adverse reactions according to anecdotal reports from numerous sources. Also you can’t argue that many more Americans have been jabbed with Covid vax than other vaccines, because the numbers are similar. Other vaccines include the ‘flu jab which millions of Americans get each year.

    This is just one example, VAERS. The UK yellow card reporting system is now up to about 1400 deaths and over a million adverse reactions, which the MHRA attempts to write off as ‘coincidental’, arguing that most of those dead are older people who would probably have died anyway, forgetting that there exists definite clinical analysis of symptoms associated with these deaths and adverse reactions, consistent with the pathology of harms due to the ‘vaccine’ itself.

    So there are your dead bodies, which may be only 10% of the actual dead bodies, according to underreporting estimates on VAERS etc., plus we still have winter to look forward to, booster jabs etc. Tell me why local authorities are tendering contracts all over the UK for the mass storage of corpses? What do they know that we don’t? Or are they just being extra cautious?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s